Barriers and opportunities for research in artificial intelligence applied to health in Latin America: A perspective based on SWOT analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59093/27112330.164Keywords:
artificial intelligence, health research, health systems, Latin America, ethics, research.Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has progressively consolidated as a tool with the potential to transform health research and clinical practice, particularly in settings characterized by high care demand and limited resources. In Latin America, the incorporation of these technologies occurs within a context marked by a high burden of disease, deep structural inequalities, fragmentation of health systems, and notable institutional heterogeneity, factors that directly shape the development, validation, and implementation of AI-based solutions. This article presents a reflection based on expert consensus on the main barriers and opportunities for research in artificial intelligence applied to health in the region. The document was developed through a structured deliberative process involving specialists in hepatology, surgery, and AI from different countries in Latin America and Europe, using SWOT analysis as the conceptual framework to organize the discussion. This exercise made it possible to identify relevant weaknesses, including the limited availability of leadership with formal training in AI, the fragility of collaborative research networks, insufficient dedicated funding, and persistent gaps in technological infrastructure. In parallel, important opportunities were recognized, such as the growing interest of the academic and clinical community, the availability of national a international funding calls the potential to consolidate multidisciplinary teams, and the support of scientific societies and regional and international collaborative networks. Based on these elements, strategies are proposed to strengthen regional capacities through structured training programs collaborative projects focused on priority clinical problems, sustainability-oriented research models, and the development of ethical and regulatory frameworks aligned with the Latin American context. Finally, the contrast with the European experience underscores the need to advance toward integrated ecosystems in which research, clinical practice, and regulation evolve in a coordinated manner, as a prerequisite for the responsible and sustainable adoption of AI in health. This consensus proposes an initial roadmap to guide the responsible development of AI research in health in Latin America.Downloads
References
Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019;25:44-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
Schwalbe N, Wahl B. Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet 2020;395:1579-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30226-9.
Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ. AI in health and medicine. Nat Med 2022;28:31-38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0.
World Health Organization (WHO). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. ISBN 978-92-4-002920-0.
Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare 2023;11:887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). Salud en las Américas+, edición 2017: Panorama regional y perfiles de país. Washington, DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2017. 260 p.
Abramo L, Cecchini S, Ullmann H. Addressing health inequalities in Latin America: the role of social protection. Cien Saude Colet 2020;25:1587-1598. English, Spanish. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020255.32802019.
Wahl B, Cossy-Gantner A, Germann S, Schwalbe NR. Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: How can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings? BMJ Glob Health 2018;3:e000798. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000798.
Panch T, Mattie H, Atun R. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: Implications for health systems. J Glob Health 2019;9:010318. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020318.
Celi LA, Cellini J, Charpignon ML, Dee EC, Dernoncourt F, Eber R, et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities-A global review. PLOS Digit Health 2022;1:e0000022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022.
Ali MR, Lawson CA, Wood AM, Khunti K. Addressing ethnic and global health inequalities in the era of artificial intelligence healthcare models: A call for responsible implementation. J R Soc Med 2023;116:260-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231187734.
Bedi S, Liu Y, Orr-Ewing L, Dash D, Koyejo S, Callahan A, et al. Testing and evaluation of health care applications of large language models: A systematic review. JAMA 2025;333:319-328. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21700.
World Health Organization (WHO). Artificial intelligence is reshaping health systems: state of readiness across the WHO European Region. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. WHO/EURO:2025-12707-52481-81028.
Saavedra J, Cafagna G. Inteligencia artificial en los sistemas de salud: ¿qué falta en América Latina y el Caribe? BM Blogs; 2025 Apr 7. Disponible en: https://blogs.worldbank.org/es/latinamerica/inteligencia-artificial-sistemas-salud-america-latina-caribe.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Índice Latinoamericano de Inteligencia Artificial (ILIA) 2025. Santiago: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe; 2025. 195 p. (Documento ONU: LC/TS.2025/68/Rev.1).
Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med 2019;17:195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2.
European Commission. European approach to artificial intelligence. Brussels: European Commission; 2025. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future initiative. Last updated 5 December 2025. Disponible en: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-approach-artificial-intelligence
Hassan M, Kushniruk A, Borycki E. Barriers to and Facilitators of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e48633. https://doi.org/10.2196/48633.
Meskó B, Görög M. A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00333-z.
Kueper JK, Terry AL, Zwarenstein M, Lizotte DJ. Artificial intelligence and primary care research: A scoping review. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:250-258. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2518.
Rincon EH, Jimenez D, Aguilar LA, Florez JM, Tapia AE, Penuela CL. Mapping the use of artificial intelligence in medical education: A scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2025;25:526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07089-8.
Kiener M. Artificial intelligence in medicine and the disclosure of risks. AI Soc 2021;36:705-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01085-w.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The authors retain copyright and grant the Colombian Association of Hepatology a non-exclusive right to publish and disseminate their work.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hepatología’s authorship policy is based on the criteria established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to credit a person for their work while assigning them responsibility for its publication.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |















